Back
Lobionella
From Williams et al., 2017:
[Lobionella, Batten and Lister, 1988, p. 355
Type species: Lobionella hirsuta, Batten and Lister, 1988 (figs.3l,5c)]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Original description: [Batten and Lister, 1988]:
Diagnosis:
Small, proximate, thin-walled cyst; shape irregular, usually broadly triangular, sometimes quadrilobate. Epicyst formed by two prominent lateral lobate projections, may also swell out slightly dorsally and ventrally; apical area often crumpled inwards or torn but occasionally may exhibit an apical bulge. Hypocyst tapering, conical and sometimes with one or two small antapical protuberances. Phragma granulate and/or covered with short hairs. Paratabulation indeterminate but small ?precingular paraplates may be visible in dehisced specimens. Archeopyle apical.
Remark:
The morphology of this form indicates that it is a dinocyst, albeit a very unusual one and unlike any other known fossil genus.
[Lobionella, Batten and Lister, 1988, p. 355
Type species: Lobionella hirsuta, Batten and Lister, 1988 (figs.3l,5c)]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Original description: [Batten and Lister, 1988]:
Diagnosis:
Small, proximate, thin-walled cyst; shape irregular, usually broadly triangular, sometimes quadrilobate. Epicyst formed by two prominent lateral lobate projections, may also swell out slightly dorsally and ventrally; apical area often crumpled inwards or torn but occasionally may exhibit an apical bulge. Hypocyst tapering, conical and sometimes with one or two small antapical protuberances. Phragma granulate and/or covered with short hairs. Paratabulation indeterminate but small ?precingular paraplates may be visible in dehisced specimens. Archeopyle apical.
Remark:
The morphology of this form indicates that it is a dinocyst, albeit a very unusual one and unlike any other known fossil genus.