Back
Spiniferites compactus
From Fensome et al., 2019:
Spiniferites compactus Cookson and Eisenack, 1974, p.59, pl.21, fig.11. Holotype: Cookson and Eisenack, 1974, pl.21, fig.11. Age: ?Aptian–Albian.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Original diagnosis: Cookson and Eisenack, 1974, p.59
A small Spiniferites-species with oval shell and short but sturdy , however, only slightly furcated processes which display broad bases and blend with the shell. The spanning-membranes are in part highly developed, they pull themselves upward onto the processes and, at the antapex, form a lamellae-system which connects the processes present at the antapex.
Dimensions: shell about 38 x 28 µm, overall about 58 x 52 µm. One specimen.
Occurrence: Power House bore, at 640 ft.
Affinities: Cookson and Eisenack, 1974, p.59
With respect to size, length and furcation of the processes, the species represents the opposite extreme to the Sp. ramosus ramosus.
Spiniferites compactus Cookson and Eisenack, 1974, p.59, pl.21, fig.11. Holotype: Cookson and Eisenack, 1974, pl.21, fig.11. Age: ?Aptian–Albian.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Original diagnosis: Cookson and Eisenack, 1974, p.59
A small Spiniferites-species with oval shell and short but sturdy , however, only slightly furcated processes which display broad bases and blend with the shell. The spanning-membranes are in part highly developed, they pull themselves upward onto the processes and, at the antapex, form a lamellae-system which connects the processes present at the antapex.
Dimensions: shell about 38 x 28 µm, overall about 58 x 52 µm. One specimen.
Occurrence: Power House bore, at 640 ft.
Affinities: Cookson and Eisenack, 1974, p.59
With respect to size, length and furcation of the processes, the species represents the opposite extreme to the Sp. ramosus ramosus.