Back
Apectodinium quinquelatum

Apectodinium quinquelatum, (Williams and Downie, 1966), Costa and Downie, 1979

Lentin and Williams, 1993, p. 30: Originally Wetzeliella homomorpha var. quinquelata, subsequently Wetzeliella homomorpha ssp. quinquelata, thirdly Apectodinium homomorphum ssp. quinquelatum, fourthly (and now) Apectodinium quinquelatum.
Harland, 1979c, considered Hystrichosphaeridium (now Apectodinium) geometricum Pastiels, 1948, to be a synonym of Wetzeliella homomorpha var. quinquelata Williams and Downie, 1966b (now Apectodinium quinquelatum). Lentin and Williams, 1989, retained these two taxa separately. If Harland's synonymy is followed, Apectodinium geometricum (Pastiels 1948 ex Downie and Sarjeant, 1965) Fensome et al., 1990, would be the correct name, since it is senior to Apectodinium quinquelatum (Williams and Downie, 1966b) Costa and Downie, 1979. Harland, 1979c, also raised this taxon to specific level, as Apectodinium quinquelatum.

Holotype: Williams and Downie, 1966, pl.18, fig.7
Locus typicus: London Clay, Whitecliff, Endland
Stratum typicum: Early Eocene

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Original description as Wetzeliella (Wetzeliella) homomorpha var. quinquelata: [Williams and Downie, 1966, p. 191-192]:

Description:
This is a variety of W. homomorpha having a thin periphragm with a distinctly pentagonal outline. Each angle of the periphragm may be marked by a branched process, larger than the rest, or by a horn not exceeding 20 µm in length.
When two antapical horns are present, the right is invariably the longer. The enclosed capsule has a pentagonal outline and is closely pressed against the periphragm save at the angles. The capsule wall is usually thin and smooth.
The tabulation is often well shown from the orientation of the processes, which in some specimens are almost restricted to the plate boundary zone in simulate complexes, whilst in others they are more numerous and irregularly arranged. The hollow, simple or branched processes tend to be concentrated on the ambitus of the periphragm. As in the typical W. Homomorpha, the processes show considerable variation distally. They are nearly always closed with acuminate, blunt or bifid tips, but several specimens with processes that open distally with aculeate or entire
margins are included since they are identical to W. homomorpha var. quinquelata in outline, wall thickness and tendency for processes to be concentrated on the ambitus. As is to be expected, intermediate forms exist between W. homomorpha and W. homomorpha var. quinquelata.

Dimensions:
holotype: periphragm, length 94 µm; breadth 105 µm. Capsule, length 69 µm; breadth 69 µm.
Observed range: outer shell, length (including horns and processes) 73-94 µm, length (excluding horns and processes) 50-72 µm, breadth (including horns and processes) 77-105 µm, breadth (excluding horns and processes) 53-70 µm. Capsule, length 47-69 µm; breadth 50-69 µm.

Affinities:
Pastiels (1948) stated that H. geometricum is represented by flattened capsules, roughly pentagonal, of which one of the sides, sometimes concave, is smaller. Unfortunately the name created by Pastiels was pre-occupied by Hystrichosphaeridium geometricum Deflandre 1942, for forms with a polygonal test from the Palaeozoic (since transferred to Veryhacium). This was pointed out by Deflandre & Cookson (1955), who in erecting W. homomorpha compared it to H. geometricum (Pastiels) and corlcluded that the two were probably synonymous. However, in the diagnosis of W. homomorpha, Deflandre & Cookson stated that the theca is polygonal, more or less rounded. A detailed study of London Clay forms attributable to the W. homomorpha-H. geometricum (Pastiels) complex has shown that there are two extreme forms of common occurrence, firstly pentagonal forms, often with well developed horns, and secondly ovoidal, sub-spherical or rhomboidal forms lacking horns. The two forms can be readily separated, although intermediate types do occur. Pastiels figured, as within his species, types identical to the two extreme London Clay forms, as well as intermediate specimens, although the holotype of H. geometricum (Pastiels) is almost pentagonal and the accompanying description suggests that specimens with a pentagonal outline were the more frequent in the Ypresian. It therefore seems advisable to restrict W. homomorpha to the forms having sub-spherical, ovoidal or rhomboidal outline, whilst defining a variety, W. homomorpha var. quinquelata, to include forms having a pericoel with pentagonal outline with or without horns. This is a workable system in the London Clay and avoids too much infraspecific variation going unheeded.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes:
G.L. Williams short notes on species, Mesozoic-Cenozoic dinocyst course, Urbino, Italy, May 17-22, 1999 - LPP VIEWER CD-ROM 99.5.

Apectodinium quinquelatum (Williams and Downie, 1966b) Costa and Downie, 1979. According to Harland (1979c, p 67), is pentagonal to rounded pentagonal in outline. Sometimes there is well developed circumcavation. The apical horn may or may not be developed. The lateral and antapical horns are always prominent with asymmetrical development of the antapical horns to an extreme where only one appears to be developed. Processes one-tenth to one-fifth pericyst diameter, with distal tips that are evexate, bulbous or open with aculeate or patulate margins. Processes may delineate the cingulum..
Size: excluding horns, length 47-80 µm, width 52-74 µm.
Feedback/Report bug