Back
Lotharingia maubeugii
Lotharingia *maubeugii Below, 1990, p.21-23, pl.4, figs.10-18; text-figs.5a-g.
Contrary to the opinion of Lentin and Williams (1993, p.405), this name is validly published. Below (1987a, p.6) stated that, unless otherwise indicated, all the material is in his personal collection. Since Below (1987a, 1987b, 1990) are parts I to III of a single study, we agree with J. Jansonius (personal communication) that Below's (1987a) repository statement refers to all three publications, fulfilling the requirement of I.C.N. Article 40.7 (see also the discussion on Article 40.7 in the Introduction).
This name was not validly published in Below (1987a, p.57), who did not provide a description; Below (1987a, caption to pl.26, fig.d) cited the name as Saxodinium maubeugii.
Holotype: Below, 1990, pl.4, figs.11,13.
Age: Toarcian.
Contrary to the opinion of Lentin and Williams (1993, p.405), this name is validly published. Below (1987a, p.6) stated that, unless otherwise indicated, all the material is in his personal collection. Since Below (1987a, 1987b, 1990) are parts I to III of a single study, we agree with J. Jansonius (personal communication) that Below's (1987a) repository statement refers to all three publications, fulfilling the requirement of I.C.N. Article 40.7 (see also the discussion on Article 40.7 in the Introduction).
This name was not validly published in Below (1987a, p.57), who did not provide a description; Below (1987a, caption to pl.26, fig.d) cited the name as Saxodinium maubeugii.
Holotype: Below, 1990, pl.4, figs.11,13.
Age: Toarcian.