Back
Kallosphaeridium hypornatum
From Fensome et al., 2019:
Kallosphaeridium? hypornatum Prauss, 1989, p.40–41, pl.6, figs.1–4; text-fig.16. Holotype: Prauss, 1989, pl.6, fig.1; text-fig.16. Originally Kallosphaeridium, subsequently ?Kallosphaeridium. Questionable assignment: Wood et al. (2016, p.78–79). Age: middle–late Bajocian.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Translation Prauss, 1989: LPP
Original description: Prauss, 1989, p.40
Cyst proximate/acavate. Outline ellipsoidal. Largest parts of cyst of smooth pedium, antapical region of rugulate, verrucate, baculate to scabrate luxuria. Ornamentation restricted to antapical pole, weakening towards the cingulum. Small "corners", reaching furthest towards the cingulum, may indicate finate positions of postcingular areae. Areation and archaeopyle as in genus diagnosis.
Dimensions: (without operculum, range) length 74.2 µm, breadth 66.7 µm.
Kallosphaeridium? hypornatum Prauss, 1989, p.40–41, pl.6, figs.1–4; text-fig.16. Holotype: Prauss, 1989, pl.6, fig.1; text-fig.16. Originally Kallosphaeridium, subsequently ?Kallosphaeridium. Questionable assignment: Wood et al. (2016, p.78–79). Age: middle–late Bajocian.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Translation Prauss, 1989: LPP
Original description: Prauss, 1989, p.40
Cyst proximate/acavate. Outline ellipsoidal. Largest parts of cyst of smooth pedium, antapical region of rugulate, verrucate, baculate to scabrate luxuria. Ornamentation restricted to antapical pole, weakening towards the cingulum. Small "corners", reaching furthest towards the cingulum, may indicate finate positions of postcingular areae. Areation and archaeopyle as in genus diagnosis.
Dimensions: (without operculum, range) length 74.2 µm, breadth 66.7 µm.